PMS, EEG, AND PHOTIC STIMULATION
David Noton, PhD The Forest Institute
Reprinted from J. of Neurotherapy, 2(2):8-13, 1997.
Two studies of premenstrual syndrome (PMS), EEG, and photic stimulation have
recently been completed at the Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith
Hospital, London (UK). In a preliminary trial of photic stimulation as
a treatment for PMS seventeen women with PMS were treated with a take-home
flashing light device for 15 to 20 minutes per day throughout their cycle.
At the end of three months of treatment the median reduction in PMS symptoms
for the 17 patients was 76% and twelve of the 17 patients technically no
longer had PMS. Separately, an EEG study of six women with PMS demonstrated
that, when they were premenstrual, their EEGs showed more slow (delta)
activity and slower P300 evoked response than when they were mid-cycle. These
results are discussed in the context of other known "slow brainwave" disorders,
such as ADD and Minor Head Injury, and various theoretical explanations are
Preliminary Trial of Photic Stimulation for PMS A preliminary trial of photic stimulation (flashing light therapy) as a treatment for PMS was recently completed by Duncan Anderson and his associates at the Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London (UK). It was an open study of 17 women, all of whom had confirmed, severe, and long-standing PMS.
The flashing light device is similar to the device previously used for treatment of migraine (Anderson 1989). It consists of a mask, which covers the eyes shutting out all light. Mounted in the mask are red LED lamps, one over each eye, which flash alternately in left and right eyes. The device is portable and designed to be used by the patient at home. The brightness of the light and the frequency of flashing are controlled by the patient, with ranges of approximately 10 to 45 mcd and 0.5 to 50 Hz respectively (one frequency cycle consisting of light in the left eye for half the cycle and then light in the right eye for half the cycle). The patients were instructed to start at the brightest setting and at the flicker-fusion point (around 30 Hz) and then adjust the brightness and frequency for best comfort. The patients were asked to use the device for 15 minutes per day, every day throughout their menstrual cycle. The patients recorded their symptoms daily for two menstrual cycles before treatment, three cycles during treatment, and one cycle after treatment was stopped.
At the end of treatment the median reduction in PMS symptoms for the 17 patients was 76%. Twelve of the 17 patients technically no longer had PMS. Although the results of an open trial are subject to placebo effects, the results were so large and persistent that it is unlikely that placebo can fully explain them. The complete results of this trial are published in detail elsewhere (Anderson et al. 1997).
Study of EEG during PMS A study of EEG during PMS was recently completed by Istra Toner and her associates at the Royal Postgraduate Medical School in London (Toner et al. 1995). Six women with self-reported PMS had 21 channel QEEG recordings and P300 evoked potentials measured during mid-cycle and premenstrually. Ages ranged from 30 to 43 and all were taking no treatment for PMS.
A significant increase in delta activity during PMS was observed (p=0.043) along with a suggestive, but not necessarily significant, decrease in beta activity. This is consistent with previous reports of increased slow activity and decreased fast activity during PMS (Harding et al. 1976, Lamb et al. 1953).
P300 evoked potential was elicited using an odd-tone procedure with a frequent tone (1000 Hz) and an odd tone (2000 Hz) presented in the ratio 4:1 at a rate of 1 per second. Using global field power averaging, a significant increase in P300 latency during PMS was observed (p=0.027).
DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION
PMS is a "Slow Brainwave" Disorder It is proposed that there is a group of disorders characterized by excessive low frequency EEG activity. For example:
Disorder Abbr. Reported Brainwave Characteristic Attention Deficit ADHD Excess theta/beta ratio (Lubar 1991, etc.) Chronic Fatigue Syndr CFS Slow alpha, excess theta (Lindenfeld et al 1996) Minor Head Injury MHI Diffuse slow activity (Duffy et al. 1989, Ayers 1987, both also quoted in Byers, 1995) Toxic Trauma TT Excess slow activity (Heuser 1994) Premenstrual Syndrome PMS Excess delta, slow P300 (Toner 1995reported above)
Based on the EEG results described above, PMS is seen to belong to this group of disorders.
Treatment of Slow Brainwave Disorders with Photic Stimulation The preliminary trial reported above shows the efficacy of photic stimulation as a treatment for PMS. The treatment of ADHD with photic stimulation has been developed extensively by Harold Russell and his associates, using frequencies of 18 Hz and 10 Hz alternating for two minute periods, with demonstrable improvements in IQ scores and behavior (Russell and Carter, 1993). Many clinicians appear to be using photic stimulation informally for ADHD and the other slow brainwave disorders, with anecdotal reports of successful treatment but with very few published results.
Treatment of Slow Brainwave Disorders with Neurofeedback
Many neurofeedback (EEG biofeedback) practitioners report successful treatment
of some or all of these slow brainwave disorders. For example, the Lubar's
have for many years worked with children with ADHD, training them with beta
frequency biofeedback, with excellent results (Lubar 1991 and 1989); the
Othmer's have a long history of success with beta frequency biofeedback with
patients with all of the disorders in this group (Othmer 1994); and there
are many other practitioners using this approach. Generally the feedback
protocol involves positive reinforcement of beta frequencies and negative
reinforcement of theta frequencies, though various other protocols are also
The Brainwave Frequency Hypothesis
A reasonable explanation that is commonly proposed for the above experimental
and clinical results is that the key to treating these disorders (all characterized
by excessive slow brainwave activity) is to speed up the brainwave frequency.
It is proposed that this can be accomplished either by training the patients
to speed up their own brainwaves (beta-training neurofeedback) or by entraining
the patients' brainwaves with a photic stimulation device flashing at beta
Problems with the Brainwave Frequency Hypothesis
Unfortunately there is evidence, both from photic stimulation research and from
neurofeedback training, that undermines this brainwave frequency hypothesis.
In the trial of PMS and photic stimulation reported above, the patients were free to adjust the frequency of the flashing light at will, between 0.5 Hz and 50 Hz. A frequency of around 30 Hz (high beta) was suggested, based on previous clinical results, but the patients were free to change this at any time in any session. Of those patients who achieved a greater than 50% reduction in symptoms, about half chose to operate the flashing light in the range of 5 to 10 Hz, ie, theta-alpha frequency, not beta frequency.
Furthermore, some neurofeedback clinicians report equally good results when treating slow brainwave disorders with frequency protocols quite different from the beta enhancement/theta reduction protocol discussed above. In fact, Hoffman et al. (1995) list six different neurofeedback protocols (including alpha training) that have been used successfully for minor head injury.
Apparently "speeding up" the brainwaves with photic stimulation or neurofeedback at beta frequencies is not an adequate explanation for the successful treatment of these disorders.
The Cerebral Blood Flow Hypothesis
Many studies have shown that excessive slow brainwave activity is closely associated with hypoperfusion, ie, insufficient cerebral blood flow. These studies have been collected and summarized by Toomim (1994). Looking at the individual "slow brainwave" disorders we see that in each case there is some evidence for hypoperfusion:
Disorder Evidence for Insufficient Cerebral Blood Flow
ADHD Localised hypoperfusion demonstrated by Zametkin et al. (1990) CFS Hypoperfusion
caused by hypotension, Bou-Holaigah et al. (1995) MHI Hypoperfusion demonstrated
by Ichise et al. (1994) TT Localised hypoperfusion demonstrated by Heuser
et al. (1994) PMS Preliminary SPECT tests show localised cerebral hypoperfusion
The causal relationship between slow brainwave activity and hypoperfusion is unclear. It is possible that reduced neuronal activity demands less blood flow or that reduced blood flow causes reduced neuronal activity or even that there is a "vicious circle" with neither component being able to initiate recovery.
However, it is known that cerebral blood flow is increased by photic stimulation (for example Sappey-Marinier et al., 1992 and Fox et al., 1988). It is possible that this is the mechanism by which photic stimulation relieves PMS and other slow brainwave disorders.
The Role of Frequency
This is not to suggest that frequency is without significance. The training
frequency in neurofeedback and the flash frequency in photic stimulation
have been shown to encourage or entrain brainwaves of that frequency and
this may have therapeutic value independent of blood flow considerations,
by training the patient's brainwaves to operate at beneficial frequencies.
And in some cases, for example alpha-theta neurofeedback, frequency is obviously
critical, enabling the patient to access early emotional material of great
However, Othmer (1996) has suggested that a major component of neurofeedback training is the exercising and training of the mechanisms of arousal and attention, regardless of the frequency which is being trained. Exercising these mechanisms might be expected to result in an increase in neuronal activity and associated cerebral blood flow.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
PMS and EEG An EEG study of six women with PMS demonstrated that, when they were premenstrual, their EEGs showed more slow (delta) activity and slower P300 evoked response than when they were mid-cycle. It is concluded that PMS belongs to a group of disorders characterized by excessive slow brainwave activity.
PMS and Photic Stimulation
In a preliminary trial of photic stimulation as a treatment for PMS seventeen
women with PMS treated themselves with a take-home flashing light device
for 15 to 20 minutes per day throughout their cycle. Thirteen of the seventeen
experienced a greater than 50% reduction in their symptoms. It is concluded
that photic stimulation is an effective treatment for PMS.
Brainwave Frequency vs. Cerebral Blood Flow
Some of the other "slow brainwave" disorders are also being treated effectively with photic stimulation and all of the disorders are being successfully treated with beta frequency neurofeedback. This has led to the common hypothesis that these treatments are effective because they "speed up" the brainwaves, but in fact, at least with these "slow brainwave" disorders, the frequency used in the treatment, whether photic stimulation or neurofeedback, seems to be of secondary importance. It is suggested that increases in cerebral blood flow and associated increases in neuronal activity may be of equal or greater significance.
Photic Stimulation vs. Neurofeedback
If both neurofeedback and photic stimulation are effective in the treatment
of these "slow brainwave" disorders, perhaps the best treatment may often be a combination of the two. Photic stimulation has the advantages of low cost and portability; it can be given to patients as "homework" between sessions and as pre-training for neurofeedback, to "teach" the brain the frequency that is to be trained. Neurofeedback develops the patient's sense of self-control and also has the unique advantage of localisation, the ability to affect neuronal activity and brain blood flow specifically at a training site chosen for its relevance to the disorder, rather than just in the cortex in general. The combination of neurofeedback and photic stimulation seems particularly appropriate for ADHD, where the patient may initially have motivational difficulties with the neurofeedback training and need assistance from any other modality available.
Amen, D., Personal communication, 1996.
Anderson, D.J., "The Treatment of Migraine with Variable Frequency Photo-stimulation," Headache, 29:154-155, 1989.
Anderson, D.J, Legg, N.J., Ridout, D.A., "Preliminary trial of photic stimulation for premenstrual syndrome," J. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 17(1):76-79, 1997.
Ayers, M.E., "Electro-encephalographic neurofeedback and closed head injury of 250 individuals," A paper presented at the National Head Injury Foundation Annual Conference, 1987 (quoted in Byers (1995)).
Bou-Holaigah, I., Rowe, P.C., Kan, J., Calkins, H., "The Relationship Between Neurally Mediated Hypotension and the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome," JAMA, 274:961-967, 1995.
Byers, A.P., "Neurofeedback Therapy for a Mild Head Injury," J. of Neurotherapy, 1(1):22-37, 1995.
Duffy, F.H., Iyer, V.G., Surwillo, W.W., Clinical electroencephalography and topographic brain mapping: Technology and practice, Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, 1989 (quoted in Byers (1995)).
Fox, P.T., Raichle, M.E., Mintum, M.A., Dence, C., "Nonoxidative glucose consumption during focal physiologic neural activity," Science, 241:462-464, 1988.
Harding, G. F. A., Thompson, C. R. S., "EEG Rhythms and internal milieu." In: Remond, A. Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (Vol 6A, pp. 176-194), 1976. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Heuser, G., Mena, I., Alamos, F., "NeuroSPECT Findings in Patients Exposed to Neurotoxic Chemicals," Toxicology and Industrial Health, 10(4/5): 561-571, 1994.
Hoffman, D.A., Stockdale, S., Hicks, L.L., Schwaninger, J.E., "Diagnosis and Treatment of Head Injury," J. of Neurotherapy, 1(1):14-21, 1995.
Ichise, M., Chung, D., Wang, P., Wortzman, G., Gray, B., Franks, W., "Technetium-99-HMPAO SPECT, CT and MRI in the evaluation of patients with chronic traumatic brain injury: a correlation with neuropsychological performance," J. of Nuclear Medicine, 35(2):217-225, 1994.
Lamb, W., Ulett, G., Masters, W., Robinson, D., "Premenstrual tension EEG, hormonal and psychiatric evaluation." American J. Psychiatry, 109: 840-848, 1953.
Lindenfeld, K.M., Budzynski, T., Andrasik, F., "EEG Patterns and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome," (Abstract) Proc. AAPB 27th Annual Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, 1996. [A more complete report, not available at the time this paper was being prepared, is: Billiot, K. M., Budzynski, T.H., Andrasik, F., "EEG Patterns and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome," J. of Neurotherapy, 2(2):20-30, 1997.]
Lubar, J.F., "Discourse on the development of EEG diagnostics and biofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders," Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 16(3):201-225, 1991.
Lubar, J. F., "Electroencephalographic biofeedback and neurological applications." In J. V. Basmajian (Ed.), Biofeedback Principles and Practice for Clinicians (3rd ed.), pp.67-90, 1989. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Othmer, S.O., personal communication, 1996.
Othmer, S.O., "EEG Biofeedback Training," Megabrain Report, J. of Mind Technology, 2(3):43-47, 1994.
Russell, H.L., and Carter, J.L., "A Pilot Investigation of Auditory and Visual Entrainment of Brainwave Activity in Learning-Disabled Boys," Texas Researcher, J. of the Texas Center for Educational Research, 4:65, 1993.
Sappey-Marinier, D., Calabrese, G. , Fein, G., Hugg, J.W., Biggins, C., Weiner, M.W., "Effect of Photic Stimulation on Human Visual Cortex Lactate and Phosphates using 1H and 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy," J. of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 12:584-592, 1992.
Toner, I., Peden, C., Carol, S., Hayden, M., Stone, J., Vucicevic, V.,, "P300 and QEEG changes during menstrual cycle." (Abstract) International Journal of Psychophysiology, 1995.
Toomim, H., "Brain Blood Flow and Neurofeedback," Biocomp Research Institute, Culver City, CA, 1994.
Zametkin, A.J., Nordahl, T.E., Gross, M., King, A.C., Semple, W.E., Rumsey, J., Hamburger, S., Cohen, R.M., "Cerebral Glucose Metabolism in Adults with Hyperactivity of Childhood Onset," The New England Journal of Medicine, 323(20):1361-1366, 1990